On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Luke Faraone <l...@faraone.cc> wrote:
This is very good news. I am all for a Sugar wrapper to smooth things out for users. One quick comment however. For something that is meant to be a thin wrapper around other people's work, GPL is a bit of a thorny choice of license. Distributing this wrapper for use with sw with incompatible licenses would be a bit of a can of worms. Maybe that's what Thomas intends -- in that case, more power to him. OTOH, if he is happy to see wider use (and still wants GPL-style protection for his code) maybe something more like LGPL could be more appropriate. cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
