On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Bernie Innocenti <ber...@codewiz.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 15:15 -0400, Luke Faraone wrote: >> > Morally, the sugar coating is not the best thing to promote the sugar >> > platform. BUT we can't wait for the supertux developer to sugarize their >> > application and we all need supertux. So... >> >> It's definitely a start, and better than having to leave Sugar entirely >> for such programs. > > libsugarize was a good hack to satisfy the requirements of Sugar's > non-standard handshake protocol without touching the application. > > However, it lies to Sugar about several things and introduces needless > complexity. All Linux desktops use a standard startup notification > protocol that works with any application: > > http://www.freedesktop.org/software/startup-notification/ > > > There's a library implementing this protocol which is already used by > Gnome and KDE. I was hoping to get this done for F11-0.88, but there > were too many other higher-priority things to do. Maybe we're still in > time for 0.90.
hmmmm rejecting a fix/patch because you hope\intend to come up with a better solution in the future:( david > Before someone asks the standard rhetoric question [*]: following > standards will make it easier to sugarize educational activities and > improve the integration of existing non-native activities. > > [*] "how does it help learning?" > > -- > // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ > \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > SoaS mailing list > SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas > _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
