On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Bert Freudenberg <b...@freudenbergs.de> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 28.05.2012, at 15:52, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Bert Freudenberg <b...@freudenbergs.de> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> SoaS still has the old Etoys version (4.1). Etoys 5 was released along 
>>>>> with Sugar 0.96. It is more robust wrt presence service failures.
>>>>
>>>> it also still needs the sugar-presence-service package which has been 
>>>> obsolete for a long
>>>> time.
>>>
>>>
>>> Etoys 5 is no worse than previous versions in that respect. On the 
>>> contrary, it deals better with presence service deterioration.
>>>
>>> Re-implementing the presence service takes time, I'm on my own, can't make 
>>> it happen soon.
>>
>> I think it's been over 2 years, I might just drop eToys from the build
>> because it always causes random issues.
>
> Peter,
>
> I urge you to not drop Etoys. It is one of the most powerful learning
> tools we offer. Sugar is greatly diminished without it. Are there open
> tickets on these random issues?

Well it would be nice if the developers actively participated and
tested in the process. We've had these issues on going for as long as
I can remember and they never get the attention that they need for
"one of the most powerful learning tools we offer" and mostly just
causes me pain.

It's not too late to fix for the core SoaS v7 release so it gives
people 6 months to actively improve the situation for the next
release.

Peter
_______________________________________________
SoaS mailing list
SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas

Reply via email to