I have run (on Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4) sudo yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing sugar*
In brief testing all good, no regressions seen - brief testing only, as this is not on a *clean* install. Iain On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 07:16 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > I think the spec was fixed by peter in sugar-speak 48-2 > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167791 > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Iain Brown Douglas > <i...@browndouglas.plus.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 14:56 +0000, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:09 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Sebastian Silva > > > <sebast...@somosazucar.org> wrote: > > > > btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, > no? > > > > > > No, it's not, it happens all the time. It might be that it > breaks in > > > certain situations, isn't re-distributable, causes > problems the > > > upstream maintainer won't fix or any number of other > reasons. What > > > ever the reason is it's historical and not documented, I > wouldn't > > > assume malice. It's likely because translations or similar > were broken > > > at the time. I mean we are talking the heady days of > Fedora 14 when it > > > was removed! > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva > <sebast...@somosazucar.org>: > > > >> I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware > it was removed. > > > >> It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as > deployed in Peru. > > > >> I was not aware of responsible for the removed > functionality nor was I > > > >> aware of any bugs related to it or performance. > > > >> > > > >> Please add it back > > > >> Sebastian Silva > > > >> http://somosazucar.org/ > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> 2014-11-25 7:17 GMT-05:00 Peter Robinson > <pbrobin...@gmail.com>: > > > >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard > <godi...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson > <pbrobin...@gmail.com> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard > <godi...@sugarlabs.org> > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory > should be deleted. > > > >>>>> > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> It goes back long before I was the maintainer and > was previously > > > >>>>> working. The question is what does it do, and why > when Speak has been > > > >>>>> working for years does it suddenly break. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 > > > >>>> > > Just an observation, mainly from what I learned the past few > days, > > rather than memory. > > > > Alice's brain in Speak has mysteriously appeared and > disappeared for me > > in SoaS. > > > > I just ran a SoaS Coconut CD, with Speak-29 on it. No > functioning brain. > > However I am guessing at the time I used it last, Speak > would have been > > updated from ASLO, and as a "Stick", the brain would have > been > > functioning. > > > > Iain > > > >>>> > > > >>>> That patch removes the bots functionality. Looks like > was done to make the > > > >>>> activity > > > >>>> work on systems with small memory (XO-1, probably) > > > >>>> cc is Sebastian, the patch author, to check if this > is still needed. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I see 438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 > removes the bots directory, > > > >>>> _and_ apply the patch sugar-speak-no-aiml.patch, to > remove the need of the > > > >>>> bots data, > > > >>>> but right now, we are not applying that patch, then > would be better add the > > > >>>> bot directory again. > > > >>> > > > >>> I suspect it was sufficiently long ago that Seb won't > remember the reason. > > > >>> > > > >>> Ultimately we need to just sort it out here. > > > >>> > > > Assertion, limited testing, please contradict: > Speak, "Ask robot a question" is broken in SoaS 1.00 > > > It has been broken for several years, but is not seen because > a Software > update has been available which provides bot/ and > functionality of "Ask > robot a question". > > Please can we release Speak-49 to restore "Ask robot a > question" > functionality in SoaS 1.00 > > > Please can we hold back Speak-49 from the closing SoaS > deadline. This > way a Speak-49 Software update will be available to fix SoaS > pro temps. > > I have no way of knowing how sugar-speak.spec file affects > XOs, so I > cannot propose to alter sugar-speak.spec myself. > > Iain > > > >>> Peter > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sugar-devel mailing list > > sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org > > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > > > -- > Gonzalo Odiard > > SugarLabs - Software for children learning > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas