On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Iain Brown Douglas <i...@browndouglas.plus.com> wrote: > I have run (on Fedora-Live-SoaS-i686-21_Beta-4) > > sudo yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing sugar* > > In brief testing all good, no regressions seen - brief testing only, as > this is not on a *clean* install.
Brilliant, and RC1 should be announced shortly with all the fixes incorporated too :-) Peter > On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 07:16 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: >> I think the spec was fixed by peter in sugar-speak 48-2 >> >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167791 >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Iain Brown Douglas >> <i...@browndouglas.plus.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 14:56 +0000, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: >> > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 13:09 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Sebastian Silva >> > > <sebast...@somosazucar.org> wrote: >> > > > btw it's sneaky to remove funcionality in a .spec file, >> no? >> > > >> > > No, it's not, it happens all the time. It might be that it >> breaks in >> > > certain situations, isn't re-distributable, causes >> problems the >> > > upstream maintainer won't fix or any number of other >> reasons. What >> > > ever the reason is it's historical and not documented, I >> wouldn't >> > > assume malice. It's likely because translations or similar >> were broken >> > > at the time. I mean we are talking the heady days of >> Fedora 14 when it >> > > was removed! >> > > >> > > Peter >> > > >> > > > >> > > > 2014-11-25 7:46 GMT-05:00 Sebastian Silva >> <sebast...@somosazucar.org>: >> > > >> I added Alice and Sara (spanish bot) but was not aware >> it was removed. >> > > >> It certainly runs quite well in spanish XO1, as >> deployed in Peru. >> > > >> I was not aware of responsible for the removed >> functionality nor was I >> > > >> aware of any bugs related to it or performance. >> > > >> >> > > >> Please add it back >> > > >> Sebastian Silva >> > > >> http://somosazucar.org/ >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> 2014-11-25 7:17 GMT-05:00 Peter Robinson >> <pbrobin...@gmail.com>: >> > > >>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard >> <godi...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Peter Robinson >> <pbrobin...@gmail.com> >> > > >>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gonzalo Odiard >> <godi...@sugarlabs.org> >> > > >>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>> > You find it. I don't know why the bot directory >> should be deleted. >> > > >>>>> > I cc to peter, who maintain the rpm. >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> It goes back long before I was the maintainer and >> was previously >> > > >>>>> working. The question is what does it do, and why >> when Speak has been >> > > >>>>> working for years does it suddenly break. >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sugar-speak.git/commit/?id=438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 >> > > >>>> >> > Just an observation, mainly from what I learned the past few >> days, >> > rather than memory. >> > >> > Alice's brain in Speak has mysteriously appeared and >> disappeared for me >> > in SoaS. >> > >> > I just ran a SoaS Coconut CD, with Speak-29 on it. No >> functioning brain. >> > However I am guessing at the time I used it last, Speak >> would have been >> > updated from ASLO, and as a "Stick", the brain would have >> been >> > functioning. >> > >> > Iain >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> That patch removes the bots functionality. Looks like >> was done to make the >> > > >>>> activity >> > > >>>> work on systems with small memory (XO-1, probably) >> > > >>>> cc is Sebastian, the patch author, to check if this >> is still needed. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> I see 438f3796a85556873c5e45d6ba01ccfa558ca198 >> removes the bots directory, >> > > >>>> _and_ apply the patch sugar-speak-no-aiml.patch, to >> remove the need of the >> > > >>>> bots data, >> > > >>>> but right now, we are not applying that patch, then >> would be better add the >> > > >>>> bot directory again. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> I suspect it was sufficiently long ago that Seb won't >> remember the reason. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Ultimately we need to just sort it out here. >> > > >>> >> >> >> Assertion, limited testing, please contradict: >> Speak, "Ask robot a question" is broken in SoaS 1.00 > >> >> It has been broken for several years, but is not seen because >> a Software >> update has been available which provides bot/ and >> functionality of "Ask >> robot a question". >> >> Please can we release Speak-49 to restore "Ask robot a >> question" >> functionality in SoaS 1.00 > >> >> Please can we hold back Speak-49 from the closing SoaS >> deadline. This >> way a Speak-49 Software update will be available to fix SoaS >> pro temps. >> >> I have no way of knowing how sugar-speak.spec file affects >> XOs, so I >> cannot propose to alter sugar-speak.spec myself. >> >> Iain >> > > >>> Peter >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Sugar-devel mailing list >> > sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org >> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Gonzalo Odiard >> >> SugarLabs - Software for children learning >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > _______________________________________________ SoaS mailing list SoaS@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas