On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 18:21 -0400, Henry Litwhiler wrote: > On 3/24/10 6:14 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > > > > > 2010/3/24 Matt Lee <[email protected]> > > I'd like to see a discussion on which PHP framework we > > should be using, > > if any. > > > > Symfony 2.0 -- http://symfony-reloaded.org/ is one that has > > already been > > mentioned. > > > > Yes this seems to be probably the leading candidate from our > > research too. > > > > http://fatfree.sourceforge.net/ > > > > Was mentioned on #irc too > > > > Would be interested to see the thoughts of others ... > > > > > While PHP could be a very good tool for displaying data and providing > an interface with GNU Social, I feel that it might be worth > considering making the "core" GNU Social application a desktop one > that would perhaps interface with an existing, standardized stack > (LAMP, etc.) to serve the files to other users' web browsers. The > (Python? C?) desktop application could include basic setting options, > but would probably be mainly just something running in the background, > keeping the server/p2p connections live.
I fully agree with this - I see GNU Social as most optimally having a server daemon that does "real work" whatever that is, with UI's in various languages/models (web UI, GTK/Qt/Whatever UI, etc.). GNUnet does this, and I think it's the right choice.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
