On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 15:10 -0400, Matt Lee wrote: > On 03/25/10 13:04, Ted Smith wrote: > > > I fully agree with this - I see GNU Social as most optimally having a > > server daemon that does "real work" whatever that is, with UI's in > > various languages/models (web UI, GTK/Qt/Whatever UI, etc.). GNUnet does > > this, and I think it's the right choice. > > GNUnet is not a good choice and it immediately breaks the design goal of > having this run on commodity webhosting. > > That's why having it work in PHP with a minimal database is key. >
I meant as a design model, not as an actual system that could be modified to build GNU Social. Though, if we're targeting end-users machines and building a p2p network, do we really care about commodity webhosting? (Probably.)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
