Would that be for the "official servers", or for what? I think that the user shouldn't have to pick a server among those within an organisation, so you would pick who should provide you the services rather then a server (such as picking Gnu, not foobar10.gnu.org). I'm not sure if this list of server names would be useful. I don't think that a lot of the server owners would use this name list.
Den 18 jun 2010 17.02, "Steven DuBois" <[email protected]> skrev: On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 14:38 +0200, Loiseau lucien wrote: > I don't get the point, if peoples install... We're compiling a list of names that may be used as titles for seperate GNU social servers. So rather than telling people to use one centralized server, they can choose between hundreds of independently run servers. -- Steven DuBois <[email protected]> Free Software Foundation - Intern
