On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Matt Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/18/2010 12:15 PM, Sean Corbett wrote: >> I think the intention is that these will just be some base instances >> of GNU Social to provide a foundation of servers to work with, not >> the entire social network per se (in the same way that identi.ca >> isn't the only StatusNet server). We wouldn't require people to use >> names from this list.. We still expect (and encourage) people to >> install their own instances of GNU Social once the alpha/subsequent >> versions are released. > > but this list is crucial too -- having a serious list of dozens of > servers will prevent everyone, even those who don't want to run their > own servers, from using the same server, which is something we'd like to > avoid.
Thanks for explaining! It all makes a bit more sense now... Dan
