I didn't think this belonged on users@ - and GRRRR doesn't read emails sent direct, so I'll post it here.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [users] TOTAL AND UTTER FRUSTRATION WITH OOO
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:33:45 -0500
From: Chad Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 08:50 -0500, Chad Smith wrote:
>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 >>>Chad Said:

>>Why would he have?  Where would he have seen that?  How would he have
>>known to do that?  Why aren't they included in the download?
>
>
> Because its listed on the support tab? THis says, "Documentation
> Project
> Templates, help guides, How-Tos, and other useful documentation for
> users"

The support tab of the website?  Okay, how do you know he got the
program from the website?  How do you know he's ever *seen* the website?
  He said he asked openoffice.org - that's the program, the project, the
community, *AND* the website - did you ever think to ask if he's visited
the website?  No.  You didn't.  You always *assume* everyone is as all
knowing as you are.  You assume that everyone is completely familiar
with open source, free software, and the whole freaking subculture that
goes along with it.  *NEWSFLASH* not everyone reads slashdot.  Not
everyone in the world who has a computer knows what a linux is.  Not
everyone is used to roll-your-own support.  And the way to teach them is
not to belittle their intelligence until they figure it out.  It's to
guide them, understanding that they may or may not have a clue what a
PDF is.  And I assume that everyone I talk to is completely new to this
until I am given an idication otherwise.  In other words, I ask.  "We
here at OpenOffice.org have a website.  It's easy to remember, because
it is the name of our program as well.  Have you been there?  It's full
of information - including starter guides that you may find useful.
Simply go to the website:  http://www.openoffice.org/ and click on the
tab that says "Support".  There you'll find all sorts of helpful links
including ones where you can download the guides...."

You *PROUDLY* display that you are the so-called "Document Co-Lead"!!!
This title (which I've never seen anywhere but on your signature line)
may just carry some weight with the people you "help" on the users list.
  Basically, you are claiming to be one of the two top guys for
OpenOffice.org when it comes to *HELPING END USERS*.  I been on this
list for over 18 months now, and you have constistantly displayed
contempt, distain, an utter-lack of patience, and hints of a hatred
toward *ANYONE* who questions the great and powerful OOo.

If you are, indeed, the Co-Lead of documentation for OpenOffice.org -
why *can't* I question you about the lack of DOCUMENTATION included in
the downloads?  If you are the Co-Lead of documentation for
OpenOffice.org, why don't you try *ADVERTISING* the documentation,
instead of chastising people for not using it.  I said before, and I'll
say it again, you're constant berating of anyone who *ASKS A QUESTION*
on the *USERS* list astounds me, and it leads me to believe that you,
yes you, personally, GRRRRRRRRRR Singleton, are the #1 WORST
spokesman-spokesperon-spokeswoman (whatever you are, GRRR can stand for
anything, male or female - I think it best for me not to try and guess),
for OpenOffice.org I've ever seen.  I'm glad when I first showed up
here, fresh off the turnip truck back in '03, before I knew what an
"open source" was, I'm glad that *you* we're the first person I talked
to.  I would have turned tail and run.


> As to why they are not included is not something over which I have > control so keep your stupid remarks to yourself or get involved with the > releases project.

I have been involved.  I'm not currently because I have a life outside
of this mailing list, and I've had things to deal with.  But I doubt you
could ever understand that, because to you, nothing matters but OOo.
Which is ironic, because you are hindering it at every given opportunity.


> Gosh, I would reasonably expect any intelligent user to take advantage > of the tabs. Anyone but you that is.

You can expect all you want, GRRRRRRRRR, but I'd think it would be
better to try and *HELP* them, instead of insulting them for not
knowing.  If someone finds their way to the mailing list (which is a
feat in and of itself) and they have a question - it would best for
OpenOffice.org for us to *ANSWER THE DAMN QUESTION* instead of saying
"that is answered in the all-powerful MANUAL, look it up, moron!"


>>Which, again, could have/should have been pointed out to the newbie >>without malice or frustration. If you choose to volunteer your time >>helping users, you really should try to *HELP* them, instead of >>insulting them. > > Well I am not omniscient like you so I guess that even to most naive > user would at least check what is available.

I'm not the one who assumes that everyone in the world knows everything
about OpenOffice.org like *I* do.  That's your opinion, not mine.  I'm
just a normal guy who has too much time on my hands so I (used to,
haven't in a while), like to read these messages and throw out an answer
or two, if I've somehow found them before.


> As to this OP, I tool umbrage at his harangue just as it have at yours.

You tool umbrage at his harangue???  Okay.  Me, I might have just got
offended.  But if you want to tool umbrage, feel free.  Maybe with
someone who talks and types like that as the Co-Lead of the
Documentation, I can understand why the help is unhelpful.

And, what kind of message is *that* sending anyway?  The Co-Lead of the
Documentation of OpenOffice.org thinks the help is unhelpful?!?!  can't
*You* Mr/Ms GRRR Singleton Co-Lead of Documentation for OpenOffice.org -
don't *YOU* have the power to change that?  I mean, if the Co-Lead of
Documentation can't fix the help - can it ever be fixed?


> You are not helpful have never been helpful and you are insulting at the > best of times. So thank you and go away.

I'm insulting to you because you need to be insulted.  You have such a
low opinion of everyone who comes on the list and asks a question
(HORRORS!  Someone DARES to ask a question on the USERS list!!!) that I
can only imagine the inflated ego you have - especially with your
self-appointed title of "Co-Lead of the Documentation".


> Chad you are being ridiculous. It's too bad. Again the resources are > there when you look. I did not design the main page but it is under > revision but I see you have not involved yourself to take care of these > concerns of yours. Therefore shut up.

Because I haven't, done what, insulted enough end users this month? I
can't have an opinion.  Okay, how about I meet my condenseding quota on you?


> THe mailing list link on the main page offers many alternatives to > individual emails from the list. If you think it is spam then > unsubscribe.

I agree - but if you sign up at 8pm at night, and post a question.  Then
go to bed, and wake up with 300 emails, 298 of which are from
OpenOffice.org - I would call that SPAM too.  Especially if I've never
used a mailing list like this before.  I was pretty shocked the first
time I signed up, and it had much less traffic back then.  I was excited
about it though, myself, because I liked the idea of so many people
talking about technology and software and freedom.  Not everyone sees it
that way.  I can *COMPLETELY* understand the man's point about being
flooded with stuff that doesn't relate to him.


> > >>>In other words OOo is not a commercial enterprize and none of us get >>>paid. Were you expecting paid support? >> >>I don't believe he ever said that. > > WHy?

because he didn't say it.  The OP didn't say "I expect paid support."
What's so hard to understand about why I don't believe he said that -
because he didn't say it.  It's very very simple, GRRRRR.  Even a
end-user can understand it.



>>If you want OpenOffice.org (or any "open" or "free" program for that
>>matter) to compete with Microsoft, then you have to stop making excuses
>>for the areas where it miserably falls short.  If OOo is "good enough" -
>>then it is good enough all around.  If it is not, don't claim it is.
>>Don't say any end user could pick it up and replace MSO with it, if
>>they, indeed, cannot.  Either OOo is a high end product with good
>>support, or it isn't.  Don't try to have it both ways.  "We're AWESOME!
>>  We have Milllions! of users!!!"  and in the next breath "What do you
>>expect for free?  Sheesh!"  You are totally sending mixed messages.
>>
>
>
> Get involved, Chad. I have.

I'm not the one who said that OOo can't compete with the support of
Microsoft because it's free.  You did.  You are the one who brought up
paid support as if it were the measure of good support - not me, and not
the OP.  You, the Co-Lead of Documentation for OpenOffice.org - YOU made
it sound like OOo's support sucks because it's free, and if the OP, or
anyone wants to complain about it - they should go somewhere else and
pay for it.  I think OOo's support system is pretty good for free.  In
fact, I've gotten more help personally from OOo's support system then I
ever did from Microsoft - paid or otherwise.  You seem to think it's not
that good.


>>>You, of course, may purchase MSO. (At least I hope you purchase it) >> >>So now you're telling the guy to buy Microsoft Office? You're a real >>supporter of OSS, aren't you? "Can't deal with *THE PRESSURE*, Punk?!? >>Don't know how to RTFM!?!? n00b!!? You can always go Microsoft! AND I >>HOPE YOU DO!" What a great slogan for OpenOffice.org! >> > > > I didn't liek what he said. I do not particularly like what you are > saying either. If you want MSO buy it. Don't steal it.

So if you, Mr/s. GRRRRR Singleton, Co-Lead of Documenation for
OpenOffice.org - if YOU don't like what someone says - then they should
go buy MSO and leave your precious OOo alone?  Right...  I guess you'd
be the only one using OOo after a while huh?  And maybe now you see why
I say you are the worst ad OOo could ever ask for - and the best for
Microsoft.



> You hone them the way you have. get stuffed.

This doesn't even make since.  I might just tool some umbrage from your
honing of my harauge if you're not careful.

-Chad Smith







Reply via email to