Bruce wrote:
> > And for Christian, I'll point out that using OOo in South Africa
> > violates the Legal Code there. Yet Sun has point blank refused to make
> > the changes that are required to makes its usage legal.
> > [At least the relevant passage was moved from the "subversive acts of
> > terrorism", which is where it was originally placed, allegedly, by
> > accident.]
>
> Can you explain this point in more detail?
Which part?
i) The fact that it was "a subsversive act of terrorism".
ii) That its usage is not legal?
xan
jonathon
--
A Fork requires:
Seven systems with:
1+ GHz Processors
2+ GB RAM
0.25 TB Hard drive space
