***>Does this mean that you do not regard public 
goods and inadequately defined property rights as 
important sources of market failure?<***

Not necessarily, but the focus of our attention is 
the financial system.
--


***>Does this mean that you advocate laws against the 
corporate form of enterprise -- i.e., what used to be 
called the "joint stock company."<***

I was not referring to corporate dividends but what 
social credit calls the "national dividend."  We are 
in favor of corporate dividends--the more the better.  
As to the corporate form of enterprise, it is one of 
the great innovations that arose in the seventeenth 
century, along with banking and insurance.  In the 
final analysis, they are all variations upon the 
common theme--pooled resources and shared risk.  Each 
contains in rudimentary form the essential elements 
of the others, so there is no fine dividing line 
between them.

Having said that, the corporation is a human 
construct that may be adjusted and improved to serve 
our purposes.

The founder of social credit, C. H. Douglas, said on 
more than one occasion that holding companies should 
be prohibited.  By that he meant corporations that 
own corporations.  In his time the most typical 
holding companies were banks.  In the United States 
today that is prohibited, although it remains common 
practice in Germany and Japan, I believe.

Now, there are corporations that own corporations 
that own corporations, Enron and Tyco being 
newsworthy recent examples.  It becomes a question of 
accountability that is difficult if not impossible in 
such complex structures.  Jeff Skilling, Enron's 
former CFO, in Congressional testimony described 
Enron's collapse as akin to a "run on the bank."  It 
was indeed.

Unquestionably, there should be exceptions.  When 
Douglas wrote eighty years ago there were no pension 
funds or beneficial insurance funds.

Perhaps the matter of limiting liability should be 
revisited.  The stockholders of the original joint-
stock companies, some of which are still in business 
today, were personally liable for the firm's debts.  
Limiting liability might be more detrimental to free 
enterprise than beneficial.

--


--------- Original Message ---------

DATE: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 09:20:29
From: Pat Gunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>Yes, but the particular set of rules is a human 
>>construct.  It is something other than a natural 
>>phenomenon, awaiting discovery.  The market in which 
>>there is undeniably a "hidden hand" is the function 
>>of that human construct that we can improve by 
>>consciously changing the rules.
>>  
>>
>Agreed.
>
>>The focus of attention for social credit is the 
>>financial system, or more specifically the banking or 
>>monetary system.  We attribute most market failure 
>>not to free enterprise per se, but the financial 
>>system under which free enterprise operates.  So we 
>>generally support laissez-faire in markets but 
>>intervention in finance.
>>  
>>
>Does this mean that you do not regard public goods and inadequately 
>defined property rights as important sources of market failure?
>
>>Unlike Keynesians or socialists, we advocate the 
>>payment of dividends directly to consumers and let 
>>them decide themselves how they will spend it.
>>  
>>
>Does this mean that you advocate laws against the corporate form of 
>enterprise -- i.e., what used to be called the "joint stock company."
>
>>We regard Say's Law to be invalid for anything other 
>>than a barter economy.
>>
>>  
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Pat Gunning, Feng Chia University, Taiwan;
>Web pages on Praxeological Economics, Democracy, Taiwan, Ludwig von Mises, Austrian
>Economics, and my University Classes; 
>http://www.constitution.org/pd/gunning/welcome.htm
>and
>http://knight.fcu.edu.tw/~gunning/welcome.htm
>



____________________________________________________________
Enter for a chance to win one year's supply of allergy relief!
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;6413623;3807821;f?http://mocda3.com/1/c/563632/125699/307982/307982
This offer applies to U.S. Residents Only

--^----------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84IaC.bcVIgP.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/create/index2.html
--^----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to