On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 02:04:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> This patch makes the private functions alloc_can_skb() and
> alloc_can_err_skb() of the at91_can driver public and adapts all
> drivers to use these. While making the patch I realized, that
> the skb's are *not* setup consistently. The skb's are now setup
> as shown:
[...]
> Please check and comment.
> 
> Marc, feel free to add your signed-off-by here.
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/2.6/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c             |   32 ------------------
>  kernel/2.6/drivers/net/can/cc770/cc770.c          |   13 +------
>  kernel/2.6/drivers/net/can/dev.c                  |   38 
> ++++++++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/2.6/drivers/net/can/esd_pci331.c           |   14 +-------
>  kernel/2.6/drivers/net/can/mcp251x.c              |   20 +----------
>  kernel/2.6/drivers/net/can/mscan/mscan.c          |    6 ---
>  kernel/2.6/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c      |   12 +-----
>  kernel/2.6/drivers/net/can/softing/softing_main.c |    8 +---
>  kernel/2.6/drivers/net/can/usb/ems_usb.c          |   16 +--------
>  kernel/2.6/include/socketcan/can/dev.h            |    4 ++
>  10 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
> 
Wolfgang,

I'm not yet totally up with include/socketcan & include/linux
seperation (which I don't like to question here).
I noticed you do patcgh include/socketcan/can/dev.h
but not include/linux/can/dev.h

I guess you just forgot, or is there a reason?

Kurt
_______________________________________________
Socketcan-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core

Reply via email to