On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:15:35PM +0100, Kurt Van Dijck wrote: > > Who want's to use can-raw in J1939 environments then? In my perception, J1939 clearly specifies 11bit is allowed on its bus, but not handled by J1939. Although this info is from 8 years back or so.
> that's like asking: who want's to use ethernet in IP environments? > It's not forbidden. But sticking to j1939 keeps you from mistakes > against the j1939 protocol. rather innocent phrase, but it makes me think I should go for a seperate address family, just as IP is seperated from ethernet. I understand it means some extra work, but looking at af_can.c must help a great deal. I consider this a wild idea, but I do not find where it is wrong. Any ideas? Thanks, Kurt _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
