Oliver Hartkopp wrote: >>> Speaking from a distribution maintainer point of view (propper) >>> autotoolized packages are far more easy to handle than hand crafted >>> makefiles. > >>> Please review, test, comment and consider to apply. >> I cross-compiled for PowerPC 6xx. "autogen" reported some "warnings", >> but that's probably normal. "configure", "make" and "make install" >> worked fine (also with DESTDIR). From my point of view these patches are >> OK and can/should go in. > > Yes. Looks really fine (as far as i can appraise :). Thanks Marc. > > I was not aware that bzero() is not available everywhere, sorry.
uclibc is lacking some obsolete functions. I noticed it while autotoolizing the can-utils. We usually don't use uclibc, though. > Marc, would you like to commit your changes yourself? Yes, done. What about removing the Makefile? cheers, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
