Oliver Hartkopp wrote: >>> Marc, would you like to commit your changes yourself? >> Yes, done. What about removing the Makefile? > > AFAICS the autoolized build system can live together with 'simple' Makefile > perfectly.
Technically, yes. Let's see if we can keep the Makefile synchron. > I really still like the 'simple' Makefile and also appreciate your autotool > work. > > Maybe some README.build or README.compile should clarify that you are able to > build without autotools, which is not available by default on many mainstream > distros, e.g. live DVDs. If you create a tarball with "make dist" the user only needs make on the system, no need for autotools. > For me it would be fine like it is now. cheers, Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
