On 08/08/2011 06:08 PM, Robin Holt wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 06:03:06PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: ... > So we would stay with the clk_* functions. I assume clk_get() would > return NULL, clk_get_rate() would just return fsl_get_sys_freq() and > the other functions would do nothing. Doesn't this really polute what > clk_* functions are supposed to do? Aren't we making flexcan dictate > a different behavior for powerpc than for the arm (and possibly other) > architectures?
Well, I see it as one way to provide compatibility with the ARM port. If the PowerPC people don't like it, we can switch to something else, whatever they suggest. Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
