On 08/08/2011 05:18 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: >>>> Our contact with Freescale would prefer that I not post that patch until >>>> we get the OK from freescale to do so since we received it under NDA. >>> >>> I don't think we currently need it. I prefer dropping and cleaning up >>> the device tree stuff as it is not needed for the P1010 anyway. If a >>> new processor shows up with enhanced capabilities requiring >>> configuration via device tree, we or somebody else can provide a patch. >>> Marc, what do you think? >> >> I will rebase shortly and provide a newer set of patches. >> >> I do think powerpc does need the device tree support. That is how the >> flexcan_probe >> is getting called. How would you suggest I do it otherwise?
I think Wolfgang was talking about removing the clock* attributes from the device tree, not the device tree bindings at all. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Socketcan-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core
