On 04/27/2011 05:08 PM, Willy Lambert wrote: > 2011/4/27 Wolfgang Grandegger <[email protected]> > >> On 04/27/2011 04:44 PM, Willy Lambert wrote: >>> 2011/4/27 Wolfgang Grandegger <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Hi Willy, >>>> >>>> On 04/27/2011 03:11 PM, Willy Lambert wrote: >>>>> 2011/4/27 Heinz-Jürgen Oertel <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>> Am Mittwoch, 27. April 2011, 13:56:10 schrieb Willy Lambert: >>>>>>> 2011/4/27 Willy Lambert <[email protected]<mailto: >>>>>> [email protected]>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> you did not mention that you have checked the >>>>>> IRQ jumpers on the PC104 board, but I'm sure you did. When you say >>>>>>> _ one PC104 CAN board with configured jumpers. >>>>>> I assume you are using this board first on the "old CPU board" >>>>>> next on the new CPU board without changing the jumpers. >>>>>> In this case, no idea. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> that's it, I did not touch anything on the PC104 stack. So the jumpers >>>> are >>>>> well configured in both cases. And I did the tests several times, they >>>> could >>>>> not have been disconnected by error. >>>>> >>>>> I recheck my linux 2.6.35.7 .config files, and they are identicall on >>>> both >>>>> CPU boards. >>>> >>>> You said, the hardware is identical, same cpu, motherboard, etc., right? >>>> >>> >>> everything is equal in term of reference (the 2 CPU board are the same >>> product with the same BIOS version,...). The only notable hardware >>> difference is the alimentation, but they both seems to be powered >> properly >>> (and the BIOS voltage values are correct, they are even better on the can >>> reticent board) and I have pluged a VGA cable on the working board (I >> don't >>> see why this could change anything on the can side) >>> >>> >>>> Do you see any diffenrence in the bootlog if you boot the same kernel? >>>> >>> >>> what do you mean by bootlog ? /var/log/dmesg ? they are very similar, see >> >> Yes, the output of "dmesg". >> >>> the logs (the good CPU is alpha). >>> it is the same .config but compiled on 2 different machines as you can >> see. >> >> Hm, they are identical. I do not see any difference!? >> > > Aaaarg miss-copied ! Very sorry for this. See the good ones > There are few differences, but I don't see anything bad > > The working board alpha is out of any compartment, the faulty one beta is in > a "PC-Box". I may try to put alpha in the PC-Box at the place of beta but I > have 2 hours of dangerous mecanics I'd like to avoid. Nothing is connected > to the PC_box exept CAN, and all the connected wires where before on alpha > (and it used to work)
On both I realized: pnp 00:0d: IRQ 11 override to edge, high Not sure if IRQ11 is a good choise. But don't aks me why it's working on one board. Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ Socketcan-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-users
