Hello :-)

Patrick Lamaizière schrieb:
> Le Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:19:20 +0200,
> Andreas Gerlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> 
>> I experiment with encrypted partitions (cryptsetup, luks:
>> aes-cbc-essiv:sha256, keylength 256 bit) with or without the geode-AES
>> engine. The result of my tests ist that when I NOT load
>> the "geode-aes" module (then the module "aes-i586" is used) the
>> encryption/decryption is a little bit faster than with the geode-aes
>> module 
> 
> On the Geode, the AES engine handles only AES keys of length == 128
> bits.

Now, crypto-options: aes-cbc-essiv:sha256, keysize=128
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^

command: time dd if=/dev/zero of=xxx.img bs=1024 count=700000

  without goede-aes (128 Bit keylength) 1m40.313s, 1m44.596s, 1m43.717s

  with geode-aes (128 Bit keylength)    36.792s,   37.774s,   37.552s


command: time cat 700MB-file >/dev/null

  without geode-aes (128 Bit keylength) 1m35.057s, 1m36.257s, 1m36.587s

  with geode-aes (128 Bit keylength):   32.546s,   32.656s,   32.653s


That's a considerable difference !!!  :-)
Thank you for the tip Patrick ;-)

Now the machine have a constant network trafic and it idles
between 60-80% (with geode-aes).

Bevor (or without the geode-aes module) the kernel-crypto-daemon
("kcryptd") needs 100% cpu time and the network traffic braeks in
again and again.

Regards
Andreas
--
Andreas G., University of Ulm, Germany
open source project --> http://yaze-ag.de/ (Yet Another Z80 Emulator)


_______________________________________________
Soekris-tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech

Reply via email to