Thanks Alberto;

One more question regarding the same subject. Is amplitude and phase 
adjustments a fixed increment throughout the whole sampling width? 
(48 kHz in my case with a Live! sound card).

I've seen Rocky to build a table of corrections, which is presented 
in a plot form.

My concern relates to the QSD amplitude and phase frequency 
dependence, in my case phase ramps 4º linearly across the bandwidth 
and amplitude from 1.03 to a 1.02 ratio.

73,

João De Marco, PY2WM 





--- In [email protected], Alberto I2PHD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> py2wm wrote:
> > Hi Alberto,
> > 
> > In SDRadio and Winradio, to what extent does the "channel skew"
> > amplitude adjustment allow for amplitude unbalance?
> > 
> > I intend to do a Monte Carlo evaluation of a QSD/audio pre-
amplifier
> > to discover the maximum tolerance of components which could be
> > balanced out by the software correcting tool.
> > 
> > 73,
> > 
> > João De Marco, PY2WM
> 
> João,
> 
>     the adjustment range in SDRadio is rather limited, as I didn't 
foresee a great imbalance in amplitude. Maybe I was 
> wrong, but currently one of the two channels has an amplitude 
multiplier that can range from 0.95 to 1.05 when you 
> change the slider position in the skew adjustment panel. The tests 
I did with my homebrew hardware indicated that this 
> range was plenty enough, but some Softrock users have reported 
that a greater range maybe would be more indicated. One 
> thing to be careful about : the Windows mixer panel for the sound 
card has small horizontal sliders for left/right 
> balancing. Please make sure that they are exactly in the middle 
position, otherwise they will introduce an error greater 
> than what my routine is capable to fix...
> 
> 73  Alberto  I2PHD
>









 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/soft_radio/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to