Lief,

There is an interesting mathematical treatment of these matters 
(sinewave at least) in:

"Balanced  Mixer Noise Considerations",  John Shigemoto, The Microwave 
Journal, October 1967.


Henry.






Leif Asbrink wrote:
> Hi Henry,
>
>   
>> Why is it only schottky mixers that have the problem - won't any high 
>> level passive mixer have the same problem?
>>     
> Yes, I would think so, but I have not tried any other passive mixer
> than the standard schottky mixers that are so populer for home-
> brewing these days. Surely unbalanced mixers sould be much worse...
>
> I would also think the problem is the same for MOS switching mixers 
> of various kinds. Maybe the AM sideband noise can be removed by
> the conversion of the LO from sinewave to squarewave but I am not 
> so sure that would help because AM modulation would probably cause 
> a varying mark to space ratio instead. By carefully designing the 
> stage that converts from sine to square one should be able to avoid it,
> (make a test by putting 5% AM modulation on the LO and see whether
> the tone comes out of the mixer when there is no RF signal.)
>
> Any mixer including switching mixers is an FM detector to some degree.
> Apply FM modulation at e.g. 1 kHz modulation frequency to the LO without
> any signal to the RF port. Increase the frequency swing until there 
> is noticeable 1 kHz audio in the mixer output.
>
> 73
>
> Leif / SM5BSZ
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   

Reply via email to