But I was originally suggesting the prior...the one that Luc-Eric said that "the team could conceivably consider."
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Steven Caron <car...@gmail.com> wrote: > nope, mixed up again... 2013 could in theory save a file knowing which > features 2012 doesn't support, but 2012 would need to radically change how > it loaded data from future (forward) versions and features it does not yet > know about. brent was talking about the latter. > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Eric Turman <i.anima...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Wait...I thought that Brent said that it was not trivial to implement a >> 'save as previous version'; It sounded like it would take considerable >> resources to implement that. >> >> -- -=T=-
