see below... On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Ana Gomez <agomezalca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello again! > > My concern was if some features have been lost in the process of exposing > the pyqt implementation from the Blur tools. the plugin is no longer related to blur tools, nothing is lost... > Or if someone has had problems by using this plugin. > > You told me that people is using it, more or less, without problem so I'm > going to keep testing it. I don't really want to install the Blur tools > just for PyQt. I don't need its rest of tools, nor the wrappers for the > rest of softwares. > exactly why i started the project, in the end jo's solution means no blur dependencies. > > I see that Steven has just made a new example that uses a ui file in > response to the last issue. Thanks and thanks for pointing me the issue, I > hadn't read it. > > On the other hand, I've rewritten some of the code in order to control the > XSI events because I don't like the idea of having unecessary active > events. I read that Steven doesn't like this idea (last comments in Issue > #1) but if you like, i'll give you the changes (well, I haven't invented > the wheel). > i wouldn't mind seeing your changes... sign up for github, fork the repro, make the changes, push them to your repo and send me a pull request.