Define "quality"!
prman can render that classroom in 7.5 minutes with better quality
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Toonafish <ron...@toonafish.nl> wrote:
just to show off the speed ;-)
stopped after 10 minutes rendering:
On 2/13/2013 17:37, Emilio Hernandez wrote:
Thanks Ronald. Too bad developers are only aiming at Maya and Max from
AD "suite". I admire the job that independent developers are putting into
this. I think I'll pass until the viewport is integrated in Softimage.
Hope it will not take as long as V-ray...
Even that Maxwell for rendering uses it's own. The workflow beween
Softimage and Maxwell is great with Fire. No fooling around or tweaking
things outside the software. I hope that Next Limit will add the GPU
processing and perhaps it will be as fast as Octane.
2013/2/13 Toonafish <ron...@toonafish.nl>
Nope, this is the best there is for SI at the moment as far as I know.
- Ronald
On 2/13/2013 17:14, Emilio Hernandez wrote:
Is the interactive window in softimage plugin available yet? Personally
I don't like switching between apps to see how the render is coming.
2013/2/13 Toonafish <ron...@toonafish.nl>
Just watch the video in this thread and install the addon:
http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=24365
Make sure you also download and replace the dll that is mentioned later
on in the thread, and if your SI camera does not export correctly, try
changing the default units in the Octane prefs to meters.
- Ronald
On 2/13/2013 16:27, Jimmy Marrero wrote:
If you have the time, can you explain the workflow with using both
octane and softimage without an interactive viewport in soft??
Thanks
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Toonafish <ron...@toonafish.nl> wrote:
an I7 3930 with a Geforce GTX 960 with 2048 MB, but I'd go for more
memory on the card if possible.
On 2/13/2013 16:08, Ed Manning wrote:
mind sharing your system config? I'm debating what card to put in a
box for Octane
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Toonafish <ron...@toonafish.nl> wrote:
yep, been playing with it the last few days and I'm really impressed
by the speed and quality of Octane.
But comparing both Arnold and Octane, all I can say is for most stuff
Arnold is still better suited and production proven, but Octane is a nice
addition. Some scenes I tested that took forever to render in Arnold render
in just a few minutes in Octane.
Can't wait for the interactive viewport plugin for Softimage though.
- Ronald
On 2/13/2013 15:00, Emilio Hernandez wrote:
Anyone here has used octane render within Softimage?
If so I will appreciate your comments and your point of view of
Octane vs other renders you have used.
And if you have used Arnold and Octane, which one you prefer.
I have the Octane experience only from the videos and the demo. It
seems to me that it is like Maxwell but a lot faster.
Cheers!
--
--
--
--
-------------------------------------------
Stefan Kubicek Co-founder
-------------------------------------------
keyvis digital imagery
Wehrgasse 9 - Grüner Hof
1050 Vienna Austria
Phone: +43/699/12614231
--- www.keyvis.at ste...@keyvis.at ---
-- This email and its attachments are
--confidential and for the recipient only--
