Mmm.  That is a good point.  I will give the knife some thickness to
shatter the object to avoid the interpenetration if there is some.


2013/2/26 Stefan Kubicek <s...@tidbit-images.com>

> I suspect the pieces from the shattered object are either interpenetrating
> right from start or have a collision offset greater than zero. Or you have
> found a bug.
>
>
>  One thing I found is that I shattered a cube with Implosia and then
>> applied
>> a Momentum DRB.  When I start simulating it kind of explodes instead of
>> just coming down.  If I shatter the same cube with the ICE shatter
>> compound
>> and then I apply the MOM DRB it behaves different and it comes down as it
>> should.  This is odd...
>>
>>
>> 2013/2/26 Stefan Kubicek <s...@tidbit-images.com>
>>
>>  Hey Rob,
>>>
>>> thanks for the heads up. The change list includes lots of issues I
>>> reported some months ago,
>>> I'm glad to see version 4 is taking shape since 3 did have some
>>> unnecessary limitations
>>> and oddities which are being addressed now as it seems. It's such a cool
>>> piece of software
>>> with so much potential....
>>>
>>>  There seems to be a new version coming:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.si-community.com/****community/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=****3427<http://www.si-community.com/**community/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=**3427>
>>>> <http://www.si-**community.com/community/**viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3427<http://www.si-community.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3427>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rob
>>>>
>>>> \/-------------\/-------------****---\/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 26-2-2013 7:40, Leonard Koch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  From my experience of working with Momentum/Implosia on a few jobs and
>>>>> watching some of the videos by MirVadim I would say, that RayFire is
>>>>> better and a lot more intuitive for complex shattering.
>>>>> The actual simulation speed and directability of the shattered pieces
>>>>> however is many times better in Momentum.
>>>>> For actual production I would be a lot more confident to make a
>>>>> simulation look the way it is supposed to with Momentum.
>>>>>
>>>>> Shattering, dynamic UVs and mainly caching are all still a bite iffy
>>>>> with exocortex's solution, but the directability is unbeaten.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Emilio Hernandez <emi...@e-roja.com
>>>>> <mailto:emi...@e-roja.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     How far is Implosia with Momentum to achieve something like this?
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?****feature=player_embedded&v=**<http://www.youtube.com/watch?**feature=player_embedded&v=**>
>>>>> mn3ifA1gcD8#<http://www.**youtube.com/watch?feature=**
>>>>> player_embedded&v=mn3ifA1gcD8#<http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mn3ifA1gcD8#>
>>>>> **>
>>>>>
>>>>> !
>>>>>
>>>>>     I need to break a wall earthquake style with ceiling coming down,
>>>>>     small fragments, etc., and wondering if I can beat this Ray Fire
>>>>>     stuff with Implosia and Momentum.  Need to win this gig.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Thx.
>>>>>
>>>>>     --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No virus found in this message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2641/6133 - Release Date:
>>>>> 02/25/13
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> ------------------------------****-------------
>>> Stefan Kubicek                   Co-founder
>>> ------------------------------****-------------
>>>
>>>           keyvis digital imagery
>>>          Wehrgasse 9 - Grüner Hof
>>>            1050 Vienna  Austria
>>>         Phone:    +43/699/12614231
>>> --- www.keyvis.at  ste...@keyvis.at ---
>>> --  This email and its attachments are
>>> --confidential and for the recipient only--
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
> --
> ------------------------------**-------------
> Stefan Kubicek                   Co-founder
> ------------------------------**-------------
>           keyvis digital imagery
>          Wehrgasse 9 - Grüner Hof
>            1050 Vienna  Austria
>         Phone:    +43/699/12614231
> --- www.keyvis.at  ste...@keyvis.at ---
> --  This email and its attachments are
> --confidential and for the recipient only--
>
>


--

Reply via email to