cinebench you mean? so what is score? :)
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Emilio Hernandez <emi...@e-roja.com> wrote:
> Now I am starting to scratch my head to figure out the maze of Nvidia...
>
> At least my benchmark said the Titatn beated up a Quadro 4000K.... ha ha
>
>
>
>
> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com>
>
>> getting around 95 score in cinebench with titan, and again 780 in home
>> comp getting 140 score in cinebench...
>> wondering how can 780 crash titan so much in opengl.
>>
>> titan system beside 4 titans have i7 3930K, asus p9x79-e ws MBO
>> and home comp i7 4770k on asus maximus VI hero
>>
>> Will test some redshift rendering later to compare single GPU 780 vs
>> titan
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Emilio Hernandez <emi...@e-roja.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Yes specailly if you are getting more than the double speed.
>>>
>>> I ran the test and I got 75.78 fps
>>>
>>> Thx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> yea I guess that woul dbe the case but just tried.. strange really no
>>>> idea.. any chance to run cinebench 15 opengl test then? if that gives too
>>>> low result as well then something is not good
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Emilio Hernandez <emi...@e-roja.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It is set to ALL.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> hmm another gues.. is it set to RT or ALL in play?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Emilio Hernandez
>>>>>> <emi...@e-roja.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I already did that and still getting the 65 fps limit with the Titan.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> just got back , yes 60 is vsync on, turn of vsync in nvida control
>>>>>>>> panel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Stefan Kubicek <
>>>>>>>> s...@tidbit-images.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I guess 60fps is the refresh rate of your display, right? Have
>>>>>>>>> you disabled VSync in the driver settings?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I just get "60.0 fps +"
>>>>>>>>> How are you getting it display a value higher than 60? I'm pretty
>>>>>>>>> sure it the actual fps is higher, but the value in the viewport is
>>>>>>>>> capped
>>>>>>>>> at 60....
>>>>>>>>> -Tim
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2014 10:12 AM, Leonard Koch wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I get about 28-31 out of my 680. Does anyone have a common
>>>>>>>>> explanation for that?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Emilio Hernandez <
>>>>>>>>> emi...@e-roja.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hey Mirko I ran your script and I got 50.7 fps...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But then I remembered I have my displays plugged in to my 470..
>>>>>>>>>> hahaha.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Don't ask why, but when using AE with the displays plugged into
>>>>>>>>>> the Ti, AE does not like it and disables GPU for calculations...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Pffff.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Tim
>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to take 2 minutes of your tmie and run this ol
>>>>>>>>>>> python script for SI with your titan?
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm getting weird results with an 780 in my home system
>>>>>>>>>>> outperforming titan a lot... well here is copy paste from forum if
>>>>>>>>>>> you are
>>>>>>>>>>> able to check it out as well.. thanks!:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> itan: ~170 fps
>>>>>>>>>>> 780: ~245 fps
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Go figure [image: :)]
>>>>>>>>>>> But I'm suspecting something weird with my titan system for some
>>>>>>>>>>> time will have to test further but would be great if anyone with
>>>>>>>>>>> titan as
>>>>>>>>>>> well could run it too?
>>>>>>>>>>> This old python script:
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.CreatePrim("Cube", "MeshSurface", "", "")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("cube.polymsh.geom.subdivu", 831, "")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("cube.polymsh.geom.subdivv", 800, "")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("cube.polymsh.geom.subdivbase", 800, "")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("Camera.camvis.refreshrate", True, "")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetDisplayMode("Camera", "shaded")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.DeselectAll()
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("PlayControl.Out", 5000, "")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.DeselectAll()
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.GetPrim("Null", "", "", "")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SelectObj("Camera_Root", "", "")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.CopyPaste("Camera_Root", "", "null", 1)
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SelectObj("null", "", "")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SaveKey("null.kine.local.rotx,null.kine.local.roty,null.kine.local.rotz",
>>>>>>>>>>> 1, "", "", "", "", "")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("PlayControl.Key", 5000, "")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("PlayControl.Current", 5000, "")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.Rotate("", 0, 8000, 0, "siAbsolute", "siPivot",
>>>>>>>>>>> "siObj", "siY", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", 0, "")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SaveKey("null.kine.local.rotx,null.kine.local.roty,null.kine.local.rotz",
>>>>>>>>>>> 5000, "", "", "", "", "")
>>>>>>>>>>> Application.FirstFrame()
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just paste in python script run and hit play.
>>>>>>>>>>> Thakns!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Tim Crowson <
>>>>>>>>>>> tim.crow...@magneticdreams.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We've been testing 1 Titan vs. 3 and so far, the speed
>>>>>>>>>>>> increase of the triple-Titan box is holding at about 2.45x. In an
>>>>>>>>>>>> email
>>>>>>>>>>>> exchange (or maybe it was on the forums, can't recall) it was
>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned
>>>>>>>>>>>> that on the topic parallelization, Pixar had determined that even
>>>>>>>>>>>> for them,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4 units together (of whatever, not necessarily Titans) was the max
>>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>> could really go before it started to cost more money than it was
>>>>>>>>>>>> worth. In
>>>>>>>>>>>> our case, I'm thinking 3 might be our max, based on some nerdy
>>>>>>>>>>>> mathematics
>>>>>>>>>>>> by one of our IT guys analyzing render times per shot, per frame,
>>>>>>>>>>>> hardware/software costs, rack space used, etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But hey, Redshift aside, the Titan in my workstation is doing
>>>>>>>>>>>> wonders for my viewport performance in Soft. I had a 58M,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2500-item model
>>>>>>>>>>>> derived from a CAD file the other day, and this thing was letting
>>>>>>>>>>>> me tumble
>>>>>>>>>>>> around it at ~15fps in Shaded mode. That ain't shabby!
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Tim
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2014 6:11 AM, Paul Griswold wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> There was a discussion on the RS forums about it. I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>> recall the numbers, though. I don't think the speed of the PCIe
>>>>>>>>>>>> slot made
>>>>>>>>>>>> a huge difference. It's really all about the speed of the card.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, although it doesn't load the entire scene into your
>>>>>>>>>>>> card's memory, the more memory your card has, the better it is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But overall, for the type of work I'm mainly doing these
>>>>>>>>>>>> days, it's extremely fast. In fact, it's so fast that I was
>>>>>>>>>>>> finding the
>>>>>>>>>>>> bottleneck was the time taken to export the mesh to Redshift, not
>>>>>>>>>>>> rendering. Redshift has a proxy system like Vray & Arnold, but
>>>>>>>>>>>> you have to
>>>>>>>>>>>> manually create proxies per object & my scene had hundreds and
>>>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of
>>>>>>>>>>>> objects, so I didn't have time to create them. Therefore, it was
>>>>>>>>>>>> creating
>>>>>>>>>>>> a renderable mesh per frame - so on a frame that took 28 seconds
>>>>>>>>>>>> to render,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 seconds was spent exporting the mesh and 8 seconds were spent on
>>>>>>>>>>>> rendering. But again, it's a beta and they're continuing to
>>>>>>>>>>>> improve things
>>>>>>>>>>>> like the proxy system.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Once I'm caught up I'm hoping to try rendering the classroom
>>>>>>>>>>>> scene and see how it does.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Paul
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ᐧ
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Stefan Kubicek
>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> keyvis digital imagery
>>>>>>>>> Alfred Feierfeilstraße 3
>>>>>>>>> A-2380 Perchtoldsdorf bei Wien
>>>>>>>>> Phone: +43/699/12614231
>>>>>>>>> www.keyvis.at ste...@keyvis.at
>>>>>>>>> -- This email and its attachments are --
>>>>>>>>> --confidential and for the recipient only--
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
