yes fps is score. hmm maybe if I got some time I could get one of titans
and test it out on maximus MBO to see if that is the diference...
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Emilio Hernandez <emi...@e-roja.com> wrote:
> Dumb question here. Where do I see the score? I only get a fps result for
> OpenGl and a 759cb in the CPU results in Cinebench.
>
> and I get 75.78fps at the OpenGl test.
>
>
>
>
> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com>
>
>> cinebench you mean? so what is score? :)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Emilio Hernandez <emi...@e-roja.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Now I am starting to scratch my head to figure out the maze of Nvidia...
>>>
>>> At least my benchmark said the Titatn beated up a Quadro 4000K.... ha ha
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> getting around 95 score in cinebench with titan, and again 780 in home
>>>> comp getting 140 score in cinebench...
>>>> wondering how can 780 crash titan so much in opengl.
>>>>
>>>> titan system beside 4 titans have i7 3930K, asus p9x79-e ws MBO
>>>> and home comp i7 4770k on asus maximus VI hero
>>>>
>>>> Will test some redshift rendering later to compare single GPU 780 vs
>>>> titan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Emilio Hernandez <emi...@e-roja.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes specailly if you are getting more than the double speed.
>>>>>
>>>>> I ran the test and I got 75.78 fps
>>>>>
>>>>> Thx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> yea I guess that woul dbe the case but just tried.. strange really no
>>>>>> idea.. any chance to run cinebench 15 opengl test then? if that gives too
>>>>>> low result as well then something is not good
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Emilio Hernandez
>>>>>> <emi...@e-roja.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is set to ALL.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> hmm another gues.. is it set to RT or ALL in play?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Emilio Hernandez <emi...@e-roja.com
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I already did that and still getting the 65 fps limit with the
>>>>>>>>> Titan.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> just got back , yes 60 is vsync on, turn of vsync in nvida
>>>>>>>>>> control panel
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Stefan Kubicek <
>>>>>>>>>> s...@tidbit-images.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I guess 60fps is the refresh rate of your display, right?
>>>>>>>>>>> Have you disabled VSync in the driver settings?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I just get "60.0 fps +"
>>>>>>>>>>> How are you getting it display a value higher than 60? I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> pretty sure it the actual fps is higher, but the value in the
>>>>>>>>>>> viewport is
>>>>>>>>>>> capped at 60....
>>>>>>>>>>> -Tim
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2014 10:12 AM, Leonard Koch wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I get about 28-31 out of my 680. Does anyone have a common
>>>>>>>>>>> explanation for that?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Emilio Hernandez <
>>>>>>>>>>> emi...@e-roja.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Mirko I ran your script and I got 50.7 fps...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But then I remembered I have my displays plugged in to my
>>>>>>>>>>>> 470.. hahaha.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't ask why, but when using AE with the displays plugged
>>>>>>>>>>>> into the Ti, AE does not like it and disables GPU for
>>>>>>>>>>>> calculations...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pffff.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <mirkoj.anima...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Tim
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to take 2 minutes of your tmie and run this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ol python script for SI with your titan?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm getting weird results with an 780 in my home system
>>>>>>>>>>>>> outperforming titan a lot... well here is copy paste from forum
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> able to check it out as well.. thanks!:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> itan: ~170 fps
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 780: ~245 fps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Go figure [image: :)]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I'm suspecting something weird with my titan system for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some time will have to test further but would be great if anyone
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with titan
>>>>>>>>>>>>> as well could run it too?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This old python script:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.CreatePrim("Cube", "MeshSurface", "", "")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("cube.polymsh.geom.subdivu", 831, "")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("cube.polymsh.geom.subdivv", 800, "")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("cube.polymsh.geom.subdivbase", 800, "")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("Camera.camvis.refreshrate", True, "")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetDisplayMode("Camera", "shaded")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.DeselectAll()
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("PlayControl.Out", 5000, "")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.DeselectAll()
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.GetPrim("Null", "", "", "")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SelectObj("Camera_Root", "", "")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.CopyPaste("Camera_Root", "", "null", 1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SelectObj("null", "", "")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SaveKey("null.kine.local.rotx,null.kine.local.roty,null.kine.local.rotz",
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1, "", "", "", "", "")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("PlayControl.Key", 5000, "")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("PlayControl.Current", 5000, "")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.Rotate("", 0, 8000, 0, "siAbsolute", "siPivot",
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "siObj", "siY", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", 0, "")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SaveKey("null.kine.local.rotx,null.kine.local.roty,null.kine.local.rotz",
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5000, "", "", "", "", "")
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.FirstFrame()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just paste in python script run and hit play.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thakns!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Tim Crowson <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tim.crow...@magneticdreams.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've been testing 1 Titan vs. 3 and so far, the speed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> increase of the triple-Titan box is holding at about 2.45x. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an email
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exchange (or maybe it was on the forums, can't recall) it was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentioned
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that on the topic parallelization, Pixar had determined that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even for them,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4 units together (of whatever, not necessarily Titans) was the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> max they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could really go before it started to cost more money than it was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worth. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our case, I'm thinking 3 might be our max, based on some nerdy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mathematics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by one of our IT guys analyzing render times per shot, per frame,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hardware/software costs, rack space used, etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But hey, Redshift aside, the Titan in my workstation is doing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wonders for my viewport performance in Soft. I had a 58M,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2500-item model
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> derived from a CAD file the other day, and this thing was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> letting me tumble
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around it at ~15fps in Shaded mode. That ain't shabby!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Tim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2014 6:11 AM, Paul Griswold wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was a discussion on the RS forums about it. I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recall the numbers, though. I don't think the speed of the PCIe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slot made
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a huge difference. It's really all about the speed of the card.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, although it doesn't load the entire scene into your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> card's memory, the more memory your card has, the better it is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But overall, for the type of work I'm mainly doing these
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> days, it's extremely fast. In fact, it's so fast that I was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> finding the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottleneck was the time taken to export the mesh to Redshift, not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rendering. Redshift has a proxy system like Vray & Arnold, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you have to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually create proxies per object & my scene had hundreds and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hundreds of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> objects, so I didn't have time to create them. Therefore, it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was creating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a renderable mesh per frame - so on a frame that took 28 seconds
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to render,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 seconds was spent exporting the mesh and 8 seconds were spent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rendering. But again, it's a beta and they're continuing to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improve things
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like the proxy system.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once I'm caught up I'm hoping to try rendering the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> classroom scene and see how it does.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Paul
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ᐧ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> Stefan Kubicek
>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> keyvis digital imagery
>>>>>>>>>>> Alfred Feierfeilstraße 3
>>>>>>>>>>> A-2380 Perchtoldsdorf bei Wien
>>>>>>>>>>> Phone: +43/699/12614231
>>>>>>>>>>> www.keyvis.at ste...@keyvis.at
>>>>>>>>>>> -- This email and its attachments are --
>>>>>>>>>>> --confidential and for the recipient only--
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
