+2
2014-03-14 16:22 GMT+01:00 adrian wyer <adrian.w...@fluid-pictures.com>: > +1 > > this; > > ------------------------------ > *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto: > softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *p...@bustykelp.com > *Sent:* 14 March 2014 15:03 > *To:* Morten Bartholdy; softimage@listproc.autodesk.com > *Subject:* Re: More XSI Monkey business by The Mill > > I wonder what the Mill think of all this debacle? > > Its so utterly ridiculous discontinuing Softimage. > > Its the best solution for designing complex character deformation bar none > in my opinion. > > Surely Autodesk aren't stupid enough to not be able to see that they have > a diamond here? > > 'Selling it as a particle system' my arse! I don't think they even know > what they have. > > Paul > > *From:* Morten Bartholdy <x...@colorshopvfx.dk> > *Sent:* Friday, March 14, 2014 2:33 PM > *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com > *Subject:* More XSI Monkey business by The Mill > > > While we are talking about why we want to keep using XSI, here goes > another very good reason: > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQo0Qtr5iU8 > > > > > > Morten > > > > >
