It's also so you can get then to sign gagging contracts.
> On 17 Mar 2014, at 19:16, Jason S <jasonsta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The idea of prewarnings, is for exactly that.. letting bigger shops in to the > decision & start transitions first, > gives a feeling of preferential treatment, & not much room to dissaprove when > it all silent and top secret, so you go ahead saying.. > "darn, but what other choice?" > > And when it all comes out, not only do the prewarned (with the loudest > voices) not speak-out (already transitioned halfway) > > but then serve as example leaders, more-or-less willingly leading the way to > the "better" way! > > Yay! > > > > >> On 03/17/14 13:53, Chris Marshall wrote: >> Just to be clear here, the only reason Glassworks have been the only big >> name co to voice their concerns, is because all the others knew this was >> coming? >> And also just to be clear, the comment from Maurice Patel "Our plans >> included pre-briefing Softimage customers with a significant ongoing >> investment in our software prior to the March 4..." >> This refers to companys with a "significant ongoing investment", which is >> basically talking about company's most valuable to AD. Can they not see that >> Softimage is used by an extremely broad user base because it is a one stop >> solution. My company is small, but it's investment in Softimage is as >> significant as any of the big facilities in that it's future relies on >> Softimage. But in terms of how valuable my company is to Autodesk, then >> that's become pretty clear. >> I'm feeling more angry by the minute! >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Chris Marshall >> Mint Motion Limited >> 029 20 37 27 57 >> 07730 533 115 >> www.mintmotion.co.uk >
