second step ! go ahead! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERrwmNH1fBM
2014-03-22 3:12 GMT+04:00 Jason S <jasonsta...@gmail.com>: > Yes.. and please note that by no means was I undermining it's > potential.. or for that matter, it's flourishing development.. & philosophy > of life (sigh) > > > On 03/21/14 18:57, Jordi Bares wrote: > > The perfect combination would be Softimage + Houdini, no doubt… ICE is > much faster but less powerful (imagine the extent of houdini) and it is > indeed harder to learn but the payback is freedom. > > Unfortunately AD has cut the bridge… there is no other route > unfortunately and if it is a Houdini only or mixed with Modo / Blender / > Whatever it is not going to be so comfortable for a while. > > :-P > > Jordi Bares > jordiba...@gmail.com > > On 21 Mar 2014, at 22:45, Jason S <jasonsta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > While Houdini may be technically more powerful, > ICE, even if still can be considered somewhat technical, is quite known to > be much more approachable and is (yet) another testament of bringing > complexity to easier reach. > > Houdini seems to be mid-way between actually scripting, and "higher level" > visual programming. > > We will wait and see how bifrost will be on the friendly (and integrated) > side > (after foam and everything else concerning naiad will be implemented.. and > graph actually exposed) > > Here is a known (performance only) comparison between ICE and VOP > > http://frenchdog.wordpress.com/2009/09/12/ice-vs-vop/ > > And here is a typical and quite fair view of SI & Houdini > > > > -- Евграфов Максим.(Summatr) https://vimeo.com/user3098735/videos ------------------------------------------------------- Хорошего Вам настроения !!! :-)
