How about Cinema 4D Eric? Have you had a look at their SDK?
> On May 17, 2014, at 2:14 AM, Eric Mootz <e...@mootzoid.com> wrote: > > Thanks for your feedback, Tim! > > Personally I would just love to port emTopolizer and emPolygonizer to Modo. > The only thing that is missing in the Modo SDK is not functionality but > documentation and examples. Note that I have not taken a look at Modo 801 yet. > > I will get back to them as soon as I'm done with the stuff I'm currently > working on. Let's see how it goes. > > Cheers, > Eric > > Am 16.05.2014 19:46, schrieb Tim Crowson: >> Eric your post on their forum a while back about lacking documentation was >> very helpful for them realizing the effects of poor SDK documentation. >> Others have reported the same thing, and I think they've realized what >> they're missing out on (3rd party awesomeness = more Modo seats). I'm >> optimistic that they'll put some real time into this. I would definitely >> stay involved as you have time and continue to give them feedback on what >> you need. They definitely need guidance on what developers want to know and >> are looking for. >> >> -Tim >> >> >>> On 5/16/2014 10:00 AM, Eric Mootz wrote: >>> Hey Sergio, >>> >>> Good to hear. However I am more interested in the C++ API. Hopefully they >>> improved things there, too! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Eric >>> >>> >>> Am 16.05.2014 16:44, schrieb Sergio Mucino: >>>> Eric. I'm not a developer, and I've only been using Modo for less than a >>>> year, but it seems there has been some progress on that front. I'd check >>>> it out for sure. At least on the Python side of things, things are getting >>>> a lot nicer. 801 introduced some new user classes that make it easier to >>>> work with the Python API. There's still some holes left to cover, but I >>>> like how it's working. >>>> >>>> Sergio Muciño. >>>> Sent from my iPad. >> >> -- >
