From Si-Community, quoting 'jonmoore' at C4DCafe.com _____________________________ << when might you eliminate perpetual sales? [...] the market generally wants it-- seems to be wanting it sooner than later.>> Now who the heck is this market? Is it a collection of users pressuring for this? (among other (wrong but legal) things?) Matt Hedberg is no user (RBC Capital Markets), he speaks on behalf of (all impersonal) investors and shareholders that each have stakes in the ADSK title, as one of their eggs in their varied baskets of eggs, all calling for one thing, -MORE- (with quite noticably (and quite unsurprisingly) very little concern for whatever implications to the end user if at all). Are there conference calls where users can say.. hey Carl, users cant access their old scenes unless they they commit with the "flexible" option. So when would you expect that to change? We've been waiting for that. Carl may be a CEO, but it's not like he, along with other executives don't answer to anyone. Responsibility is to shareholders first. (who quite normally, predictably and constantly couldn't care less) But here it's almost like their saying "it's time!" time for what? well.. the hegemony of the company is at a point where it's (yet) more complete, enough to take advantage of the fact that users (further) don't have much other choice other then to take what the company decides is good for them (once more) (which is actually only (very) 'good' for [ADSK].. and basically (very) bad for anyone else) quote from Carl Bass: Three years from now it will be surprising to me if anybody is really running very much perpetual desktop software. Another quote from Carl said that ideally everything would be on the (controlled) cloud by around that time, being when most of everyone would then essentially be had (by the balls) Three years from now, it will be surprising to me if anybody is really running Autodesk software. (unless the fairly high likelihood of everyone basically becoming screwed (further) comes to pass) On 08/29/14 13:34, Perry Harovas wrote:
|
- Autodesk considering ditching perpetual licenses Perry Harovas
- Re: Autodesk considering ditching perpetual licens... Sebastien Sterling
- Re: Autodesk considering ditching perpetual li... Francois Lord
- RE: Autodesk considering ditching perpetual li... Sam Bowling
- Re: Autodesk considering ditching perpetua... Perry Harovas
- Re: Autodesk considering ditching perpetual licens... Jason S
- Re: Autodesk considering ditching perpetual li... Sergio Mucino
- Re: Autodesk considering ditching perpetua... Sebastien Sterling
- Re: Autodesk considering ditching perp... David Gallagher
- Re: Autodesk considering ditching perp... Martin Yara
- RE: Autodesk considering ditching perpetua... Sam Bowling
- Re: Autodesk considering ditching perp... Sebastien Sterling
- Re: Autodesk considering ditching... Perry Harovas
- Re: Autodesk considering ditching... Luc-Eric Rousseau
- Re: Autodesk considering ditc... Tim Leydecker
- Re: Autodesk considering ... Jason S