In my experience, everyone complains about documentation, and I've also read complaints about the Softimage documentation being terrible. I've been a customer of the Maya user guide, and I've found it good, what did you not find? What does a "overhaul" mean and what would it look like? I find the user documentation between the two products is very similar.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Leendert A. Hartog <hirazib...@live.nl> wrote: > Just as a deliberately annoying side-note: improvements and humanization > efforts for Maya are obviously more than welcome, but the easiest way to > make Maya more easily accessible would be IMHO a thorough and thus > fundamental overhaul of the documentation. Softimage might have been less > capable than Maya in some respects, but it's documentation has always been > "rock-solid". Which, I add for dramatic effect, the Maya documentation > isn't. And sadly that make a significant - often underappreciated - > difference when having to work with the software, especially when starting > out to do so. > > Greetz > Leendert > > -- > > Leendert A. Hartog AKA Hirazi Blue > Administrator NOT the owner of si-community.com >
