Dear all, I have just read the new DS-Lite version and I have the following comments for Section 8:
(1) " 8.2. NAT conformance A dual-stack lite AFTR SHOULD implement behavior conforming to the best current practice, currently documented in [RFC4787] and [RFC5382]. Other discusions about carrier-grade NATs can be found in [I-D.nishitani-cgn]." * This text should be updated to something like: "a DS-Lite AFTR MUST follow the requirements specified in [I-D.ietf-behave-lsn-requirements]". * In addition, [I-D.ietf-behave-lsn-requirements] is to be listed as a normative reference. (2) Section "8.3. Application Level Gateways (ALG)" is to be removed since this can be covered in [I-D.ietf-behave-lsn-requirements]. Cheers, Med -----Message d'origine----- De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Alain Durand Envoyé : jeudi 3 mars 2011 16:50 À : Jari Arkko; Ralph Droms Cc : [email protected] list; Yong Cui Objet : [Softwires] DS-lite update Dear ADs, New rev of the them main DS-lite doc (draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite-07) and the DHCP tunnel option (draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-option-09) have been published. I believe they address all remaining comments. This should enable to restart the IESG process. - Alain. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
