In your previous mail you wrote:
A dual-stack lite AFTR SHOULD implement behavior conforming to the
best current practice, currently documented in [RFC4787] and
[RFC5382]. Other discusions about carrier-grade NATs can be found in
[I-D.nishitani-cgn]."
* This text should be updated to something like: "a DS-Lite AFTR MUST follo=
w the requirements specified in [I-D.ietf-behave-lsn-requirements]".
* In addition, [I-D.ietf-behave-lsn-requirements] is to be listed as a norm=
ative reference.
=> I have a mixed opinion about this: RFC 4787 and 5382 are clearly
disconnected from the reality to stay polite. CGN (aka LSN)
requirements should be better but it is a work in progress.
I can't see a solution, in particular if we want this document to
be published as a RFC soon...
Thanks
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
