On 7/21/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But are we sure we want that in schema.xml? Or should it be in solrconfig.xml instead?
Hmmm, a case could be made for either.... Ideally, most of the info one needs to understand and query and index would be in the schema.xml (hence it makes sense for copyField to be there). Since this will affect the "language" of the query parser, it can make sense to go in schema.xml But if a case were ever made for configuring this stuff per-request handler, or if there were a more generic mechanism for the whole default-in-request-handler-and-overridable-via-query pattern, then it might make sense for solrconfig.xml Related: if someone were to take the time to understand the surround query parser, where would it's config go? -Yonik
