On 11/7/06 2:30 PM, "Mike Klaas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/7/06, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> 1. Adding fuzzy to the DisMax specs. > > What do you envisage the implementation looking like?
Probably continue with the template-like patterns already there. title^2.0 (search title field with boost of 2.0) title~ (search title field with fuzzy matching) >> 2. Adding a phonetic token filter and relying on the per-field analyzer >> support. > > I'm not sure why any modification to solr would be necessary. You > could add a field with a phonetic analyzer and use copyField to copy > your search fields to it. Search will use the modified analyzer > automatically. Ah, I missed the <analyzer> example with a stock Lucene analyzer. Oops. I still need to write an Analyzer, because there is no standard phonetic search in Lucene today. There are some patches and addons floating around. Still, it seems like others might want to use a phonetic token filter with the <filter> specs. I'd be glad to contribute that, if others think it would be useful. wunder -- Walter Underwood Search Guru, Netflix
