On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 13:57 -0800, Thorsten Scherler (JIRA) wrote: > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > ] > > Thorsten Scherler updated SOLR-133: > ----------------------------------- > > Attachment: SOLR-133.diff > > Fixing bugs from first version. > > Adding workaround for problem with direct use of the handler (never gets a > stream). > http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-dev@lucene.apache.org/msg02759.html > by patching the SolrUpdateServlet > > Please test, it works fine for me.
This version does not change XmlUpdateRequestHandler to use StAX instead of XPP, but adds a XmlUpdateRequestHandlerStax. Since I need to touch the patch again to revert the SolrUpdateServlet, I wonder whether we want both? Should I prepare the next one to use StAX instead of XPP? salu2 > > > change XmlUpdateRequestHandler to use StAX instead of XPP > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: SOLR-133 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-133 > > Project: Solr > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Reporter: Hoss Man > > Attachments: SOLR-133.diff, SOLR-133.diff > > > > > > there has been discussion of using StAX for XML parsing of updates instead > > of XPP ... opening an issue to track it as a possible improvement > > (orriginally mentioned in SOLR-61, but that task was more specificly about > > refactoring the existing code) > -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java & XML consulting, training and solutions
