It's a relief to know this is not out of the project scope. Do you have any recommendation to ease keeping the patch 'up to date' with the trunk? What else can/should I do to help the review?
Yonik Seeley wrote: > > On 6/15/07, Henrib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The idea of the multiple core/indexes feature has been discussed in many >> threads and it seems/seemed it has/had some functional value; how do we >> ensure this value is generic enough for the issue (& patch) to ever be >> solved? More importantly, is there an issue in the first place? >> >> For all use cases where it might make sense to use multiple indexes, the >> common (as in community and commiters) wisdom is that one index is enough > > I think that's the case mainly because it reflected the capabilities > of solr at the time... so if someone asks how they create more than > one index, the natural reaction has been to ask "do you really need > to?" in the spirit of helping them quickly solve their problem with > what was available. > > Of course, now there is your very ambitious SOLR-215, which I > personally haven't had the time to look at, but I commend your great > writeup on it - it really helps to have that type of detailed overview > when attempting to evaluate such a large patch. > > -Yonik > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-indexes-cores-%28aka-solr-215%29-functional-value--tf3927076.html#a11178197 Sent from the Solr - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
