On 9/19/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is this still the case? I'd be more inclined to check it in if 1. It > didn't fail badly in the case of unicode and 2. Yonik hadn't fixed > the current client but days ago.
I stand corrected the solr.py in svn now works, instead of barfing on the new solr response format as it did a few days ago. I didn't check if it handled unicode correctly...that can wait for a test suite :-) -- r577338 | yonik | 2007-09-19 11:55:56 -0400 (Wed, 19 Sep 2007) | 1 line make solr.py work with current server -- So I agree there is no urgency on getting the new implementation checked in. I didn't realize yonik was going to update the existing client. //Ed