: Hmmm, no reason I see.
: Unless there are objections, I'll make them public.

-0 ... i'd much rather see us deprecate it and make it go away entirely.

it's an archaic throwback to the days when every option was going to 
be encoded into the "q" param instead of having "sort" "rows" and "start"   
(ie: q = solr rocks; price asc, score desc, skip 50, top 10 ... or 
something like that)

Last time i looked at most usages, the getOffset() and getCount() were 
totally ignored and the only reason any class refered to SortSpec was 
because they had to (since there is no parseSort that just returned a 
Sort object)

A quick grep indicates that the new QParser and QueryComponent stuff 
(which i still haven't had time to look at) seems to be using it, but i 
can't tell if that's just because that's what's parseSort returns, or if 
it's becuse it's actually useful to have those three values bundled in 
that way.

if we're going to keep it, let's at least put some mutators on it ... and 
maybe consider changing the name.



-Hoss

Reply via email to