I second that; it's always difficult to maintain documentation but having a good looking end result always seem to reduce the amount of effort... Plus, using Confluence, there are certainly a few things that could be nicely linked to Jira (both being Atlassian products with a nice license for Open Source projects). I guess a 'prototype/proof-of-concept' conversion would need to be made first; count me in if I can help.
ryantxu wrote: > > I think its safe to say we that the solr wiki is not nearly as complete > as it could/should be. I've added a ton of stuff to 1.3 that needs some > documentation. Beyond the normal, 'I dislike writing docs' thing, I > find writing things in MoinMoin disappointing and even less fun then it > needs to be. For all the work you put into it, it never really looks > good. > > Compare: > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore > To: > http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/dropdownchoice-examples.html > > I know it is a bit severe to suggest switching wikis, but I'll throw it > out there and see how you all feel about it. > > If we did decide to switch, importing should not be too hard: > http://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CONFEXT/MoinMoin+Importer > > Another cool thing about the Confluence wiki is a plugin that takes wiki > snapshots for each release. I remember some concern with apache > licensing issues.... wicket does it, so maybe its ok > http://code.google.com/p/couldit-autoexport/ > > Another crazy suggestion from ryan? > Maybe I should sleep on it? > thoughts? > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Confluence-wiki-vs-MoinMoin-tf4960631.html#a14211188 Sent from the Solr - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
