I guess I'll shut up for now; we seem to have gone at it for awhile
and I'm
not sure what more there is to say on either party.
If history is any indication, the issue will lay fallow for 3-4 months
then flare up the next time someone bangs their head on JUL.
I agree with Hoss and Erik that JUL is fine in the servlet container
context . As a .war file, it is really the container that needs to
handle logging. *however* when SOLR is used as a .jar (or a
custom .war), it is a shame to force everyone to deal with JUL in
addition to whatever else they are already using.
As long as there is strong opposition, I think we can deal with JUL...
ryan
