I don't want to drag this on and on - I understand the point that solr
should stick with JDK logging because already uses it. I'll disagree
with anyone who says it is easy to hook up to log4j.
I fully support the addition of the trivial classes (what are we
talking, 10 lines of code or so?!) it takes to adapt JUL to other
logging systems being added to Solr itself until these logging
systems have their own adapters built-in.
Is there really a 10 line program to do this? I was able to jury-rig
something to make this happen, but it is ugly and not general. In
SOLR-549 it looks like Henri may have a more general solution -- but
it is way more then 10 lines, and really should just be SLF4J.
If Erik and Hoss are against changing the logging, then it is kinda a
non-issue, but I'm confident it will be raised again within 3 months ;)
ryan
