FYI, I will take a look at this next week (just in case you are
wondering why I haven't since I was the one making the noise).
On May 6, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Sean Timm (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12594603
#action_12594603 ]
Sean Timm commented on SOLR-560:
--------------------------------
Thanks for taking a look at SOLR-554, Patrick.
I did test the log level selector with this SLF4J patch and it works
fine as is. It might be desirable to change the log level names in
the log level selector to match the names in SLF4J however.
From the SLF4J FAQ:
"SLF4J is only a facade, meaning that it does not provide a complete
logging solution. Operations such as [...] setting logging levels
cannot be performed with SLF4J."
Convert JDK logging to SLF4J
----------------------------
Key: SOLR-560
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-560
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Wish
Reporter: Ryan McKinley
Fix For: 1.3
Attachments: slf4j-api-1.5.0.jar, slf4j-jdk14-1.5.0.jar,
SOLR-560-slf4j.patch, SOLR-560-slf4j.patch
After lots of discussion, we should consider using SLF4j to enable
more flexibility in logging configuration.
See:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-Logging-td16836646.html
http://www.nabble.com/logging-through-log4j-td13747253.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
