[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12654118#action_12654118
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-877:
-----------------------------------
bq. Does every param need to be consistent?
No... there's certainly no mandate... "rows" and "facet.limit" are established
enough now that neither should be changed IMO.
It just seems like more consistency rather than less generally seems like a
good thing, balanced with other factors of course. It also affects usability -
if people think about this more like faceting, they are more likely to quickly
type terms.limit by mistake.
Of course these things are aesthetic and subjective - would be nice to hear
from someone else on preferences before a release.
> Access to Lucene's TermEnum capabilities
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-877
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-877
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-877.patch, SOLR-877.patch, SOLR-877.patch
>
>
> I wrote a simple SearchComponent on the plane the other day that gives access
> to Lucene's TermEnum capabilities. I think this will be useful for doing
> auto-suggest and other term based operations. My first draft is not
> distributed, but it probably should be made to do so eventually.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
