On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Otis Gospodnetic<otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Would it make sense to instead add new tint(eger) type instead of renaming > integer to pinteger? (thinking about people upgrading to Solr 1.4).
People upgrading can always use their existing schemas - remember that the naming is local to the schema... the class always defines the real behavior and the java class names won't be changing. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
