I our internal testing , the binary request writer gave very good perf for large no:of docs.
Though we did not benchmark it On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Grant Ingersoll<gsing...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Aug 16, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > >> I just profiled a CSV upload, and aside from the CSV parsing, Solr >> adds pretty much no overhead! >> I was expecting some non-trivial overhead due to Solr's >> SolrInputDocument, update processing pipeline, and update handler... >> but profiling showed that it amounted to less than 1%. >> >> 85% of the time was spent in Lucene's IndexWriter >> 12% of the time was spent in the CSV parser2 > > I'm curious how much overhead there is in parsing Solr XML. I will try some > tests on that later if I get a chance. We really should push clients to use > the Binary request/response formats in most cases. > -- ----------------------------------------------------- Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
