On Sep 28, 2009, at 10:09 PM, Bill Au wrote:
Dropping it completely from 1.4 seems a little too drastic to me,
since the
problem is with IE8 only.
Yeah, but the last patch had doubts about IE7, too. Bill, is there
any chance you could try out the patch and test it and apply it?
I'd like to see it released too, as then it will attract more
attention, otherwise, we can remove it from just this release.
Bill
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com>
wrote:
can we leave it in svn, but drop it from the release? logistically,
what is the best way to do this? Make a branch now, remove it from
/trunk, after release copy it from the branch back into /trunk?
That seems like the best way to kick the can down the road. I agree
an off-the-shelf apache license jquery client is great.
ryan
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Grant Ingersoll
<gsing...@apache.org>
wrote:
Moving to GPL doesn't seem like a good solution to me, but I don't
know
what
else to propose. Why don't we just hold it from this release, but
keep
it
in trunk and encourage the Drupal guys and others to submit their
changes?
Perhaps by then Matthias or you or someone else will have stepped
up.
On Sep 28, 2009, at 7:27 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
I just discussed this off-line with Matthias. It does not look
like
he has the time to give this much attention now. (nor do I)
We agreed that the best steps forward are to:
1. Support the Drupal guys GPL port
2. Archive the solrjs code to solrstuff.org
3. Yank solrjs from apache svn (and 1.4 release)
4. Add links to the drupal code (GPL) and the solrjs archive
(Apache)
Does this sound reasonable to everybody?
ryan
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org
>
wrote:
Forwarded with permission from Peter Wolanin on a private thread.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Peter Wolanin <peter.wola...@acquia.com>
Date: September 26, 2009 9:43:23 AM EDT
To: Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
Subject: Re: 8 for 1.4
I talked to the guys reworking the JS library for Drupal at
Drupalcon
- they are also having to fork potentially around license as
much as
anything else, since they'd like to distribute via drupal.org,
which
means they were hoping to get the original author to re-license
the
code to them as GPL.
-Peter
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org
wrote:
Argh, this was meant for solr-dev.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>
Date: September 25, 2009 1:34:32 PM EDT
To: solr-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: 8 for 1.4
Reply-To: solr-u...@lucene.apache.org
Y'all,
We're down to 8 open issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseVersion.jspa?id=12310230&versionId=12313351&showOpenIssuesOnly=true
2 are packaging related, one is dependent on the official 2.9
release
(so
should be taken care of today or tomorrow I suspect) and then
we
have
a
few
others.
The only two somewhat major ones are S-1458, S-1294 (more on
this in
a
mo') and S-1449.
On S-1294, the SolrJS patch, I yet again have concerns about
even
including this, given the lack of activity (from Matthias, the
original
author and others) and the fact that some in the Drupal
community
have
already forked this to fix the various bugs in it instead of
just
submitting
patches. While I really like the idea of this library
(jQuery is
awesome),
I have yet to see interest in the community to maintain it
(unless
you
count
someone forking it and fixing the bugs in the fork as
maintenance)
and
I'll
be upfront in admitting I have neither the time nor the
patience to
debug
Javascript across the gazillions of browsers out there (I
don't even
have IE
on my machine unless you count firing up a VM w/ XP on it) in
the
wild.
Given what I know of most of the other committers here, I
suspect
that
is
true for others too. At a minimum, I think S-1294 should be
pushed
to
1.5.
Next up, I think we consider pulling SolrJS from the release,
but
keeping
it in trunk and officially releasing it with either 1.5 or
1.4.1,
assuming
its gotten some love in the meantime. If by then it has no
love, I
vote
we
remove it and let the fork maintain it and point people there.
-Grant
--
Peter M. Wolanin, Ph.D.
Momentum Specialist, Acquia. Inc.
peter.wola...@acquia.com
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids)
using
Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids)
using
Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids)
using Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
